Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 23

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 28

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 34

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 38

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 45

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 49

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 58

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 62

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 71

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/ord.php on line 81

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/libraries/vendor/joomla/string/src/phputf8/utils/validation.php on line 40
9/11 & False Flag Operations

Site Search

The Truth About 9/11

Coming soon!

Coming Soon

Warning: "continue" targeting switch is equivalent to "break". Did you mean to use "continue 2"? in /home/lybs0cinwsl2/public_html/att/templates/att2017a/functions.php on line 199


Hamas says now in 'open war' with Israel, promises 'gates of hell'

Pin It

Palestinians extinguish the fire after an Israeli air strike on a car in Gaza City November 14, 2012. (Reuters)

As Israel launched a full-scale attack on Gaza with frequent sounds of rockets still being heard in Gaza - killing 13 and injuring over 100 - Hamas vowed to avenge the Israeli strike and the assassination of its military leader Ahmed Jabari.


Read more: Hamas says now in 'open war' with Israel, promises 'gates of hell'

All Jews had to pay half their income to Muslims? - Sharia

Pin It


There is a myth that Jews (Dhimmi) living in Islamic lands had to pay 50 percent of their income in taxes (Jizya) to Muslims. This is another attempt by non-Muslim historians to re-write history and demonize the golden past between Jews and Muslims.


In this study, we will define, quote, and compare the burden of tax ratio for Muslims and non-Muslims in Islamic and non-Islamic lands.


Understanding Jizya (Dhimmi [non-Muslim] tax)


According to the commentaries by Yusif Ali [1281], the root meaning of Jizya is compensation. The derived meaning, which became the technical meaning, was a poll-tax levied from those who did not accept Islam, but were willing to live under the protection of Islam [Protection against surrounding Christian Crusaders and Pagans] and were thus tacitly willing to submit to its ideals being enforced in the Muslim State.


Did All Jews have to pay Jizyha ?


According to Islamic law as quoted by Malik's Muwatta Book 17, Number 17.24.46:

"The sunna is that there is no jizya due from women or children of people of the Book, and that jizya is only taken from men who have reached puberty.”


In other words, men of military age, were excused from joining the army in exchange for paying jizyha. According to Abu Hanifa, there are also exceptions for the poor, slaves, monks and hermits.


How much tax did the Jews have to pay ?


Islamic Law states that “if” Jews trade in Muslim countries, coming and going in them, a tenth is taken from what they invest in such trade. This is because jizya is only imposed on them on conditions, which they have agreed on. {Muwatta Book 17, Number 17.24.46}. Live stock was accepted as payment Book 17, Number 17.24.45) . Therefore, the true Islamic tax rate for non-military joining Jews was 10%, not the mythical amount of 50%.


Did Muslims or Jews pay more in tax ?


Both Jews and Muslims were required to pay tax in Islamic countries. The Muslim tax was called “Zakat”, which was much more broad.


Jews did not have to pay any zakat on any of their property, livestock, produce or crops while Muslims –did-. Zakat also varied depending on the Muslim's situation, depending on the size of property, number of live stock, amount of savings, on average, the Muslim paid more taxes than the non-Muslim.


Besides an average of Muslims paying more taxes, Muslims also had to pay with their lives, they had to join the army and defend the country, whereas non-Muslims in the country were not required to enlist, again displaying the price for the Muslims was higher than for the non-Muslims.


Both Muslims and non-Muslims alike faced force if the tax was not paid:


Collecting Zakat (Muslim tax) Book 17, Number 17.18.31: "Yahya related to me from Malik that he had heard that Abu Bakr as-Siddiq said, "If they withhold even a hobbling cord I will fight them over it."


Tax amounts in Islamic compared to non-Islamic countries:


In Islamic countries, military aged capable Jewish men are required to pay 10% tax, how much tax do non-Muslims and Muslims alike have to pay in non-Islamic countries? Here is a international comparison of tax burden ratio chart;




Tax Burden Ratio percent























Note: Tax Burden Ratio: Ratio of tax burden in national income. Source: Annual Report on National Accounts Economic Research Institute, Economic Planning Agency (Apr. 10, 2000)


What is the burden of tax ratio in Israel ?


In Israel, not only is it mandatory for both men and WOMEN, to join in the army, but men and women in Israel have to face one of the world’s highest tax rates;


Workers in Israel earning NIS 10,001 a month ($30,000 a year) are subject to a marginal tax rate of 55 percent,

As the Bank of Israel's annual report for 1999 noted, Israel's marginal tax rate is higher than that of all but two OECD countries (Belgium and Denmark)


According to the Bank of Israel report, Israel has one of the highest tax-to-GDP ratios in the western world. This ratio stood at 40.1 percent in 1998, the bank said, compared to an average of 37.7 percent among the OECD countries in 1996 (the last year for which figures were available).


How much tax do Muslims pay in the Zionist country?


As documented, Jews did not pay 50 percent of their income in taxes, also cited, Muslims **do** have to pay Over 50 Percent in taxes for living in Israel. When Palestine (Israel) was forcefully taken from Muslims and driven into a Zionist country, Muslims were ordered to pay one of the highest tax rates in the world or face arrest and imprisonment in a torturous Israeli jail.


In conclusion, the accusation that Jews were forced into paying 50% of their income is a myth, the sultans in Islamic countries followed strict Islamic law to stay in power, which dictated that willing and able Jewish men only had to pay 10% on their trade income. Our study also documents how the Islamic taxation system was one of the best in history when compared to non-Islamic countries, namely Israel. vent frustration on having to pay over 50 percent of one’s income for taxes in Israel. We also conclude that this myth may be an attempt by Jews to vent frustration on having to pay over 50 percent of one’s income for taxes in Israel.


A secret army of Jewish-trained psychopaths

Pin It
The real Norway story–A secret army of Jewish-trained psychopaths prepared to strike anywhere in the world and then blame it on somebody else
 Posted: July 27, 2011 by crescentandcross in Uncategorized



18 Votes


We have all witnessed a media syllabus unfold before our eyes these past few days, a demonstration of the paradigm that keeps the world locked into this false anti-terror paradigm, in which the terror is always manufactured by the people who claim to be fighting the terror. Do you get it yet? The only Muslim terrorists you ever hear about all work for the Mossad and the CIA.
You watched it. First Wolf Blitzer, the notorious Israeli agent anchorman, comes on CNN and announces that the Norway mass murders were done by Al-Qaeda, providing yet another reason, he says, why we should ramp up the War on Terror.
Shortly thereafter, when the mythmakers realize that story won’t fly, it is announced that the Norway massacre was carried out by some unknown party. Never, in any newspaper in the United States, is there a mention that the Norway atrocities were carried out by Israel, by Jews, by “friends” of Israel and Jews.
This is the implementation of cognitive dissonance at its finest, as the blurring of political categories keeps everyone confused. Jewish diversity at its best. CNN’s story about al-Qaeda doing the Norway murders is about as credible as Saddam having weapons of mass destruction, or Germans gassing 6 million Jews during a period of time, demographics has shown, when the Jewish population of Europe increased.
Uncountable TRILLIONS of dollars have been stolen by Israel, by Jews, by “friends” of Israel and the Jews, and continue to be stolen as we speak, in a million different ways, while anesthetized Americans find any excuse to look the other way, fearful of forfeiting their paychecks from whatever employer is facing the inevitable question: If I offend the Jews, will they put me out of business? Answer is: they will. And that’s why the United States is essentially out of business today: a hundred years of intense Jewish parasitism have totally erased any claim to morality Americans ever pretended to have.
Now, the host, our country, is about to expire, bled to death by those who worship the bottom line and don’t care about anything else. Congratulate yourself for the role you have played in all this, and the silence you have displayed while participating.
The young people killed in Norway were the finest, most caring and most intelligent, that Norway had to offer. Norway had recently gone on record as nourishing the Palestinians by recognizing their ambassador and criticizing Israel’s treatment of them publicly. Judging by the response in Israeli newspapers, Jews generally believe that Norway got what it deserved.
What does that mean?
Compare what happened right after 9/11 to the past week.
Remember the kneejerk reactions of the planted TV interviewees while 9/11 was happening? “Oh, it must have been Al-Qaida.” Worldwide Jewish media is still singing the same tune.
The murderous Norway caper pretty much blows away the remaining fragments over the long-discredited story that the 9/11 attacks were done by Muslims to provide the lame excuse for the War on Terror against the entire Islamic world. Can’t you get it through your heads? All the terror attacks — 9/11, Madrid, London, Bali, Mombasa, Yemen and now Norway, all of them false flag operations coordinated by the real axis of evil in the world: the Mossad, the CIA and MI-6, to convince the world that it is threatened by terror.
True, the world is threatened by terror. Only the people fighting terror are the ones manufacturing terror so they can fight it. This is a very Jewish philosophy, it’s what they do, it’s what they have always done and will continue to do.
But because the Jews own ALL the media in the world — ALL the media in the world, you heard it right; consider the distribution networks — you don’t hear that. You hear blind allegiance to the official version of events, or you will be ruined, if not killed.
The Norway psyop mass murders, in an epidemiological way, also resemble the recent public floggings of journalists Helen Thomas and Rick Sanchez, whose ordinary remarks about Jews earned them heaps of Jewish media scorn and more importantly, conveyed to the public that it would never be profitable to say anything about Jews. The Roman orator Cicero said almost the same thing almost two thousand years ago.
The underlying psyop message to the world from the Norway abomination is that if you actively work to oppose the Jews, you could be gunned down at any time by Jewish sayanim or mind-controlled Gentile slaves who are programmed or drugged to repress their human instincts and become solely an instrument of Jewish policy — which, in case you haven’t yet learned, Jewish policy is to kill or enslave every non Jew in the world. You can look it up. It’s in the Soncino Talmud (1929).
But then, that’s not such a change in the facts on the ground. People have always been getting killed for their political beliefs. Many writers have commented that assassination has been the one political tool that has governed American history more than anything else.
From Jack Ruby to Dylan Klebold. When you dig deeply, it seems like all the assassinations that ever happened were carried out by Jews, or by people operated by Jews. Consider that when you consider the Norway assassinations, 68 of them.
The policy of keeping silent, most Americans are afraid to contemplate, always eventually results in your own murder. It’s up to you to determine if you want to defend yourself and admit what’s really going on.
It’s checkout time for the Jews. Or, you can continue to take your cue from all those astute Jewish commentators who still insist the system can be fixed if you just accept their well-considered suggestions.
And for the non Jews, it’s seriously past time to ask an even more serious question. Now that we know this rancid system can’t be fixed, look yourself in the eye and ask yourself if this hollow, ravaged, insincere, oblivious, poisoned, and looted vestige of what America used to be is, and I mean this sincerely, even worth saving?
All America has become today in the world is a giant robotized Jewish war machine that kills people unjustly while its drugged and deluded populace looks the other way, refusing to admit they have become mindless puppets in a giant game show in which the host, picked at random from a giant pool of Jewish sayanim (many of whom are now federal judges), gets to say who lives or dies.
As Walter Cronkite used to say: “You Are There!”
By John Kaminski
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Stoning to death is Un-Islamic - Part 1

Pin It

Stoning to death is Un-Islamic
Posted on January 18, 2011 by admin
The story of
~ the one who has been sentenced ~
“Death by stoning”
Part OneIntroduction In October 2001, a young Muslim woman named Safiya Hussaini was sentenced to “Death by stoning” by an Islamic Sharia Court of Sokoto, North Nigeria. This hardhearted sentence was issued in a country which is bitterly divided between the Muslims in the north and Christians in the south. After world wide protests to save the life of Safiya, and the unceasing efforts of many private and governmental organizations and commissions, that sentenced was overturned on a technical ground. In March 2002,  the Islamic Appeal Court of Sokoto ruled that the act of adultery was committed, before the Sharia Court had made it an illegal act. Recently in August 2002, a thirty years old Muslim widow named Amina Lawal has been sentenced to “Death by stoning”, by another Islamic Sharia Court at Bakori in a nearby State of Katsina, North Nigeria. Amina’s newly born girl – Wasiya, is presently (October, 2002) ten months old. As soon as her period of weaning is over the sentence will be carried out, in a public square. Amina will be buried up to her neck and stoned by the misguided Muslim men of her home town. With each stone they throw, aiming at Amina’s head, they will be raising their voices with the cry of a victory. This inhumane performance of brutality will be carried out before the world media. With their TV cameras zooming from the head of the helpless Amina to the hands of the stone throwers, the commentators will have the field day in captivating their viewers, the world over. Many of these viewers will have no stomach to watch this kind of barbaric punishment after a minute or two. One can easily switch off the TV or change the channel of one’s TV, but how can one shut off his mind, heart and soul from the reality of the “Stoning”? The act of Stoning will commence with small stones and move to the bigger stones, until the guilty party is pronounced dead. The international media will not inform its viewers, listeners and readers  that these stone throwers who are shouting “Allah-u-Akbar” have in reality REJECTED the Revealed Commands of Allah. A Muslim is the one who has submitted himself or herself freely, willingly and voluntarily to the WILL of the Almighty Allah. And, His Will is duly recorded in the Islam’s Scripture – the Qur’an (Koran). The word “stoning” or the phrase “Death by stoning” does NOT appear in the Qur’an, as a penalty for any crime or sin. We shall soon see how this distorted Sharia Law of “Death by stoning” has crept into the Islamic Society, especially in countries like Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan. This noble Campaign is requesting the readers to act now and save the life of Amina Lawal, before this sentencing is physically carried. This Campaign is also to eradicate, once and for all, this un-Islamic Law from the Islamic society so that one does not have to make repeated protests. The most appropriate manner of approach would be to ENLIGHTEN the followers of Islam, the world over, with the True Islamic Law that is ordained and promulgated on the subject matter, by Allah Himself. The prescribed penalties are preserved in the Qur’an which the Muslims read today with devotion. Once the educated Muslims are made aware of what that Allah’s Law is and how it is being hi-jacked by a few ill-informed Muslims of Nigeria, they would raise their voices from within the community and request others of like minded to join the protest. Many of the educated Muslims are not aware of the fact that Allah has given the guilty parties the privilege of living and marrying.No believing upright Muslim would like to see, having read these facts, that this God given privilege is wrongfully deprived and the precious lives are cut short under any pretext, plea or rationalization and especially NOT a clarification put forth in the name of Allah and His Deen (religion) – Islam. Allah the Most Merciful has identified “the mankind” as His Vicegerent upon the earth. What we are seeing in this punishment of “Stoning to death” is the other extremity – the Most Mercilessness . No one knows what would be the fate of Amina’s ten months old daughter Wasiya, once her mother is Mercilessly dispatched from this world by an unjust human law enacted as Islamic Sharia Law.~THERE CAN BE NO LAW ABOVE THE LAW OF THE CREATOR~
AMINA LAWAL and her daughter WASIYA
Photo by the courtesy of Globe and Mail, Toronto, CanadaThe day when the prescribed penalty for the sin of adultery and fornication was revealed by Allah through His Messenger Muhammad (s.a.s.), all the past Traditions, Rulings, Examples and Directives from the Prophet and/or from all other individuals or societies do stand repealed permanently. To propagate otherwise, would be to place the “Human Law” above the “Law of Allah”, which in Islam is regarded as an unpardonable sin. The scholarly commentaries presented in part two do clearly demonstrate that Allah’s Law is NOT AT ALL partial or inequitable between married and un-married individuals as being often propagated. There are a few Muslims who do propagate, based upon a “re-reported narrative” called Hadeeth, that the Second Caliph (successor to the Prophet) had said in one of his sermons that there used to be a Revealed Verse for “Death by stoning”but it has since been lost and is not to be found in “The Holy Book”.
I wish to inform these propagators that this is a fundamentally faulty narrative – Hadeeth. Here arethe indisputable facts from the Islamic history to substantiate my remark. i) The Second Caliph died in 644 C.E. ii) The Revelations that came to the Prophet were collected and compiled in a book form by the Third Caliph. iii) This final compilation of the Holy Book (al-Qur’an) was done in 651 C.E. (i.e. seven years after the death of the Second Caliph). In defies logic that a person could have passed such a remark for “The BOOK”, which was compiled years after his death. iv) Even if one was to entertain the notion that the Second Caliph had indeed made such a serious statement in public concerning the Qur’an, then it could not have escaped the notice of his successor who undertook the task of compilation. v) It is inconceivable that not a single member of the Commission, appointed for the compilation of “The Holy Book” did not hear that Sermon nor its narrative. To say that the Third Caliph and/or the Commission knew of the “Lost Verse” and yet ignored the allegations and did not include that verse is to say that they all were totally incompetent. vi) Did Allah who had promised to Guard His Revelation (see Qur’an 41:42; 15:9 and 73: 20) failed to safeguard the “Holy Book”? vii) The fact of the matter is that the Muslim scholars of our ear have discovered that there are over 5,000 weak, spurious and fabricated Hadeeths (sayings and deeds of the Prophet), in circulation that Islam “absolves today”. It is essential to note that the re-narrated narratives (Hadeeths), that are in circulation today were complied more than two centuries after the passing away of the Prophet. For those individuals who had forged the narratives in the name of the Prophet, during that period of six or more generations, it was not difficult to forge narratives in the name of a Caliph. For details of these 5000 Hadeeths that Islam absolves today, please visit But, please complete this article first. In part two, the readers will know what are the precise Commands of Allah for the adulteries and the fornication. There are scholarly comments by Muslim scholars, will lay bare how the Sharia Court has REJECTED Allah’s Revealed Sublime Law. Please click below and read part two. God Bless You All:Save Life – of – Amina Lawal — Part Two

Death by Stoning - Part 2

Pin It

Akbarally Meherally

The story of
~ the one who has been sentenced ~
“Death by stoning"
Part Two
...if anyone slew a person 
- unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land -
it would be as if he slew the whole people: 
and if anyone saved a life,
it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people.
 Qur'an Chapter 5, Verse 32
All translations and commentaries (unless stated), 
are from Abdullah Yusuf Ali's original unedited version.
The numbering of verses may vary slightly in some other translations.
Allah's Supreme Law:
The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication*  flog each of them...  Qur'an 24, verse 2
Commentary # 2954
Zina* includes sexual intercourse between a man and a woman not married to each other. It therefore applies both to adultery (which implies that one or both of the parties are married to a person or persons other than the ones concerned) and to fornication, which, in its strict signification, implies that both parties are unmarried. The law of marriage and divorce is made easy in Islam, so that there may be the less temptation for intercourse outside the well-defined incidents of marriage. This makes for greater self-respect for both man and woman. Other sex offenses are also punishable, but this Section applies strictly to Zina as above defined.  (The end of the original commentary, written by the translator Abdullah Yusuf Ali).
Below is the SUPERFLUOUS TEXT added to the above commentary by The Presidency of Islamic Researches, IFTA, Call and Guidance, Saudi Arabia, in their Revised Editions published from Saudi Arabia. The name of the commentator for the added text is not stated. It is also unknown as to who are the so called Muslim jurists and when and where the opinions were expressed.
Although zina covers both fornication and adultery, in the opinion of Muslim jurists, the punishment laid down here applies only to unmarried persons. As for married persons, their punishment, according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace be on him), is stoning to death.
Below are two commentaries by other Muslim scholars that do uphold the ORIGINAL commentary by Abdullah Yusuf Ali:
Commentary written by Maulana Abdul Majid Daryabadi of India:

The Arabic word zanaa denotes sexual intercourse between any man and woman, whether married or not, who do not stand to each other in the relation of husband and wife; and, as such, has no single word equivalent in English language. It includes both adultery (i.e. illicit sexual intercourse of two persons either of whom is married to a third person) and fornication (i.e. illicit sexual intercourse of unmarried persons).
Note: The entire text including what is within the brackets is reproduced from 'Tafsir-ul-Quran' Volume III, under verse 24 : 2.
Commentary by the translator Muhammad Asad to verse 24 : 2, reads:
The term zina signifies voluntary sexual intercourse between a man and a woman not married to one another, irrespective of whether one or both of them are married to other persons or not: hence, it does not -- in contrast with the usage prevalent in most Western languages -- differentiate between the concepts of "adultery" (i.e., sexual intercourse of a married man with a woman other than his wife, or of a married woman with a man other than her husband) and "fornication" (i.e., sexual intercourse between two unmarried persons).
Sunnah of the Prophet (peace and blessings be upon him):
   The superfluous commentary mentions "according to the Sunnah of the Prophet (peace be on him)", and since the Sharia  Laws are generally based upon Sunnah of the Prophet, it is essential to understand the term "Sunnah". The word by itself means the "trodden path". Here the term refers to the legal way or ways of the Prophet; orders and acts of the Prophet and the authentic statements made by the Prophet that have by tradition become the outstanding models for the Muslims to follow. The next few questions in the line would be: Did the Prophet order "Death by stoning"? If he did, for whom? And, most importantly before or or after the promulgation of Allah's Law?

   Below are the three narrations on the penalty of stoning, from the famous book of the Prophetic Traditions and Narrations known as Sahih Al-Bukhari:

    Hadith No. 4.829: When a Jew and a Jewess who had committed the illegal sexual intercourse were brought before the Prophet (s.a.s.), he ordered them to be punished according to their Jewish laws that are recorded in the Torah. The couple was stoned to death. This Hadith was narrated by Abdullah bin Umar.

    Hadith No. 8.805: A married man from the tribe of Bani Aslam who had committed illegal sexual intercourse and bore witnesses four times against himself was ordered by the Prophet (s.a.s) to be stoned to death. 
This Hadith was narrated by Jabir bin Abdullah Al-Ansari.

     Hadith No. 8.804: Ash Shaibani narrates that when he asked 'Abdullah bin Abi Aufa; "Did Allah's Apostle carry out the penalty of Rajam (i.e., stoning to death)?" He said, "Yes". When the narrator asked; "Before the revelation of Surah-an-Nur or after it?" He replied, "I don't know." This Hadith is narrated by Ash Shaibani and is repeated one more time under Hadith No. 8 : 824


1.  The Surah-an-Nur (i.e. Chapter 24 of the Qur'an, in which the penalty of flogging is prescribed) was Revealed in or after the sixth year of Prophet's migration from Mekkah to the city of Medinah. This is confirmed by verses 11 to 20. It is inconceivable that the Prophet who has been declared by Allah as the best of the examples for Muslims, could have dictated his own edict after the revelation of Surah-an-Nur, which was delivered to mankind through him.

2.  It is a known fact that before the promulgation of the Quranic Laws, the Prophet and his followers used to follow many of the Abrahamic Traditions and the Law of Moses. Once the specific Law of the Qur'an was Revealed to the Prophet in that matter, the ancient traditions and laws became null and void.

3. The Hadith No. 5: 805 does speak of a married man being "stoned to death" but it does not specify the period when that had penalty was confirmed. Before or after the Revelation of Allah's Law. One cannot use this example of "a married individual" and interpret it to be applied to the Revealed Verse and then Create the distinction between the act of adultery and the fornication.

4.  There is NO recorded authentic Narration in which the Prophet has made a ruling or given the directive that there is to be observed a distinction or inequality between the "married persons" and "unmarried individuals" when the penalty for the illegal sexual intercourse is to be applied. Nor, there is any explicit directive or a command of the Prophet asking the followers that the  Revealed Verse of "flogging" is ONLY for the "unmarried individuals".

5.  Why is the Islamic Sharia Law NOT applied to the MALE individual in  this particular case? The Court is required to have Four Witnesses to the act of Adultery, to pass the Judgment. The Court needed no Witness in case of the mother, because she had given birth to the girl and that was the sufficient Witness. Why not use the blood of that same girl as the Witness for the Father? Today it is not difficult to identify the Father with the DNA a test, after Amina having named the Father. Is NOT the Nigerian Sharia Law BIASED?

Allah's Law permits the guilty person to live and remarry (see below). No one has the authority to deprive that God given privilege...

Let no man guilty of adultery or fornication marry any, but a woman similarly guilty, or an Unbeliever, nor let any but such a man or an Unbeliever marry such a woman: To the Believers such a thing is forbidden.  Qur'an Surah-an-Nur (24) verse 3. 
(This verse 3, follows the verse number 2 in which the penalty is prescribed and it emphasizes the fact that DO NOT KILL THEM.)
Commentary # 2957 to the above verse:
Islam commands sex purity, for men and for women, at all times, - before marriage, during marriage, and after the dissolution of marriage. Those guilty of illicit practices are shut out of the marriage circle of chaste men and women.

Surah-an-Nur REPEALED the previous directives permanently...
In the September 2002 Special Issue of 'Renaissance' - A Monthly Islamic Journal, which is a part of the movement for revival of the Muslims under DAR-UL-ISHRAQ, appears a scholarly article THE PENAL LAW OF ISLAM. 
It is written by Javed Ahmad Ghamindi and Shehzad Saleem. Under the subtitle Fornication, after quoting passages from the various Surahs, the authors have added the following text. It supports the notion that the punishment prescribed in Surah Nur prevails. URL for the Journal is
    This was the punishment of fornication in the Shari‘ah before a definite directive was revealed in Surah Nur. Once this was revealed, it repealed the previous directive permanently.
Two Significant Verses of the Glorious Qur'an:
Say: "Allah's guidance is the (only) guidance and we have been directed to submit ourselves to the Lord of the worlds. 
Qur'an Chapter 6, Verse 71
And if any fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed they are the wrong-doers (Ar. Zalimuun). Qur'an Chapter 5 : 45
If Allah - the All Knowing, had desired to convey; that while JUDGING BY what HE has REVEALED one was to observe a clear distinction between "the married" and "the unmarried" individuals for the sin of Zinna (adultery), then HE would Revealed the TWO distinct SETS of punishments, which He did not.
Today, is there a SINLESS Man living on this planet that could step forward and say; I will be the first to cast, the First Stone? O' Muslims of Nigeria, fear Allah and remember; in the vary same Surah An-Nur, just three verses later He reveals; there are exceptions for the guilty, who repent and mend their conducts, FOR ALLAH IS OFT-FORGIVING, THE MOST MERCIFUL...

Here is the Good News from the Canadian Television, CTV News:
Nigerian government vows to block stonings (10/29/2002)
Nigeria vowed Tuesday to block Islamic courts from carrying out any executions by stoning, promising to hold the line against sentences in northern states that have provoked international protests and boycott threats.

However, until and unless the Islamic Shaira Courts decide to abide by the
Government rulings the threat to the life of Amina Lawal continues to exist.

My Appeal to the Islamic Sharia Courts of the world:
"wa kaana 'amrul-laahi qadaram-maqduuraa."
"And the Command of Allah is a Decree Determined."  Glorious Qur'an 33: 38
An interesting portion from the REBUTTAL is reproduced below. This rebuttal is received from Jamiatual Ulama (KZN), Council of Muslim Theologians, Durban. To get a copy of the entire rebuttal one may write to 
Shaykh Ahmad Kathrada, Adminstrator, <This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.>

"There are many other Ahadith of Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) from which the "stoning of adulterer and adulteress" is clearly proven.
Hadhrat Abdullah ibn Abbas (Radiyallahu Anhu) narrates the lecture that Hadhrat Umar (Radiyallahu anhu) delivered whilst sitting on the pulpit of Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam)" 
(Note: The Arabic text of the above narration is not reproduced but it's translation, mentioned in that Rebuttal, is reproduced below)

Hadhrat Umar (Radiyallahu Anhu) said, "Verily, Allah Ta’ala sent Muhammad (Sallallahu Alayhi wa sallam) with the truth, and revealed the Quran upon him. The verse regarding the stoning of the adulterer/ess was from amongst the verses revealed (in the Quran). We read it, understood it and memorised it. Rasulullah (Sallallahu Alayhi Wa Sallam) stoned and we stoned after him. I fear that with the passage of time a person may say, ‘We do not find mention of stoning in the Book of Allah and thereby lead astray by leaving out an obligation revealed by Allah. Verily, the stoning of the adulterer/ress is found in the Quran and is the truth, if the witnesses are met or there is a pregnancy or confession."
(Sahih Al-Bukhari Vol. 2 pg. 1009 / Sahih Muslim Vol. 2 pg. 65)

Hazrat Imam Malik (rah) in his famous Muwatta (Pg. 349) has included the verse referred to by Hazrat Umar (radiyallahu anhu). The verse reads, “The married man and married woman, when they commit adultery then stone them.”
This verse is from among those verses whose recitation has been abrogated but its hukm (injunction) still applicable. Similarly there are verses that are presently recited but their hukm is not applicable. The discussion regarding abrogation of Quranic verses requires lengthy and detail explanation, the volume of which cannot be addressed in this article.

Narrations from Abdullah bin Ahmad substantiated by ibn Hibban (rah) and Hakim (rah), verify the fact that there is a verse of the Quran regarding the stoning of the adulterer and adulteress, which is abrogated in terms of recital only.

End of that interesting protion from the REBUTTAL.

My response:

The above text mentions: "We read it, understood it and memorised it."
It is hard to conceive that a verse of such a serious consequence that was "READ, UNDERSTOOD AND MEMORIZED" by "WE" meaning several Muslims was LOST TOTALLY!  Yet, "its hukm (injunction)" was NOT LOST!!! Please go to  PART ONE  of this article and read my lengthy response to such baseless conjectures. I wish to remind the readers and those who have rebutted that the verse number 9 of Surah Al-Hijr (15), is NOT LOST, it is well preserved and reads: "We have without doubt sent down the Message; and We will ASSUREDLY GUARD IT."

Should a Believer place his/her Imaan (faith), on the above verse which is duly recorded in the final compilation of the Qur'an and is available today for us to READ and UNDERSTAND --or-- upon something that is alleged to have been Lost or Abrogated and is not within the Final Compilation and Promulgation?

Here are two verses numbers 17/18 of Surah Al-Qiyamat (75) and they reveal: "It is for Us to collect it and to promulgate it: But when We have promulgated it follow thou its recital." After reading the above quoted verses one cannot take a stand that the final Compilation and Promulgation, when it was done by Hadhrat Uthman (r.a.), was for some reason or reasons not "FULLY COMPLETE IN ALL RESPECT" and the MESSAGE is not "FULLY GUARDED IN ALL RESPECT" unless that person prefers to be 
the REJECTER of the above quoted Verses of the Glorious Qur'an.

IF.. the verse of Rajam (Stoning) was ABROGATED by Allah (SWT) then the "following - obeying" of that Message was also Abrogated by Allah (SWT). And, He had Revealed the Substituted MESSAGE in Surah Nur verses 2 to 5. Why not follow that MESSAGE which is before us, and be on the SAFE SIDE?

Allah Alone Knows The Truth

November 5, 2002

Copyright � 2012 - ATT Media

All Rights Reserved.